Since the onset of the current Gaza-Israel horror, the most significant aspect of the conflict for our country has been the way in which it has revealed deep fractures in Britain, particularly in England. The events 2,000 miles away are not a surprise, they are the continuation of nearly a century of conflict over land. If Britain was governed and represented by politicians who focused on our peoples’ needs, the Palestine-Israel war would be of no concern. Instead, it has come to dominate political life, as MPs struggle to show their allegiance to two ethnic groups in Britain who have a deep interest in the matter. In the past few days, MPs’ efforts to balance the inevitable contradictions of a multi-cultural society have reached new heights. The result has been MPs’ surrender to the mere threat (albeit a powerful one) of Islamist violence of the most extreme nature. The chaos in the House of Commons has signalled to world, and, much more importantly, to the British people, that it is no longer, even in outward show, the master of its own decision-making.
Last November, the SNP tabled a motion calling for an ‘immediate ceasefire’ in Gaza. The motion was not of the slightest importance to either Israel or Hamas. Instead, it was designed by the SNP to signal to Muslims in Scotland that it took Hamas’ side in the conflict, while, at the same time, causing mischief in the Commons aimed at undermining the SNP’s biggest rival, the Labour Party. Unsurprisingly, 56 MPs, including 10 Labour shadow cabinet ministers, voted for that motion. Those Labour MPs included long-time supporters of Palestinian groups, along with MPs with significant numbers of Muslims in their constituencies. As Shadow frontbench ministers Sarah Owen and Rachel Hopkins, both Luton MPs, said ‘[we voted] with our conscience…a feeling we share with our diverse town’. ‘Diverse’ being the code, in this case, for a town with only a 45% white population, and with 34% of its population being Muslims. That vote, although it did not pass, was a marker. Three days ago, the SNP returned, with a motion calling for ‘an immediate ceasefire’ and condemning Israel for ‘collective punishment’ – a war crime. Neither could be countenanced by Keir Starmer, or other Labour leaders, who tend towards the interests of the second ethnic group in this mess, British Jews who support Israel. As a result, Labour tabled an amendment with the two ‘offending’ clauses removed. This created an unsustainable crisis for many Labour MPs. They could rebel against their own leadership, or they could vote for the amendment and risk the wrath of Muslims and, potentially fatally, that of Islamist terrorists.
We now know that the feeble, guppy-mouthed speaker, Lindsay Hoyle, was approached by multiple Labour MPs, and by Keir Starmer. The Labour MPs were in fear of their lives. The very same group of people who have helped bring death and destruction to multiple countries over the last 25 years, and happily despatch British forces to war, death and maiming, showed that they are cowards. Further, Hoyle and other senior MPs have been given intelligence briefings warning that Hamas operatives are here, in Britain. As Charles Walker MP has revealed: ‘There is a real threat to MPs in the current climate, citing information about security issues that he cannot discuss publicly’. Cowering in the Palace of Westminster, dozens of MPs, protected by armed police, concrete barriers, and the British Army, realised that they would have to leave their palace and face the prospect of death from elements of the multi-cultural society they have forced upon us. The result of that fear was the Hoyle upended Parliamentary rules and struck out the SNP motion, enabling MPs to vote for the revised motion that they desperately hoped would protect them from Islamist terrorists. The shame of that cowardice was displayed for all to see. Islamists now determine the behaviour of the UK Parliament. What could MPs and Parliamentary leaders possibly do next…
Lindsay Hoyle addressed the issue of the terror threat to MPs that had led to the defeat of Parliament. And that threat, according to Hoyle is, ‘White fundamentalists’ and the ‘Rise of the Extreme Right’. He did make a slip in the interview, when he said, ‘Terrorists coming across…’, but couldn’t manage to say from where, or how. Could it be ‘across the Channel in small boats’? Or ‘in the back of lorries’? Just for the record, since 2000, far right terrorists (including a Ukrainian immigrant), all lone wolves, have murdered 3 people, and wounded 3. In the same time period, Islamist terrorists in the UK have murdered 110 people (including a large number of children and women) and injured and maimed 980 people. But Hoyle’s inability even to say the words, ‘Islamist terrorists’, was only part of the Narrative affirmed.
On Saturday, 24 February, confected outrage came into effect, with every possible mouthpiece for the ideology of multi-culturalism, demanding the sacking from the Parliamentary Conservative Party of Lee Anderson MP for the crime of ‘Islamophobia’. Anderson, who has the role, intended or otherwise, of ‘man of the people’, was duly sacked by Rishi Sunak. The UniParty could pretend to itself that it was back in control of the Narrative. In three days, the focus had gone from fear of Islamist terrorism targeting MPs to the loathing of ‘Islamophobic’ Anderson. But they are only fooling themselves and the broadcast media and the other cheerleaders of this rotten regime.
Once all the immediate fuss dies down, probably overtaken by some other foreign quarrel that has nothing to do with our people, some war that we ‘must’ pour blood and money into, we will still be left with the absolute knowledge that the UK Parliament is a Parliament of cowards. It will get worse. It is now very likely indeed that a new government will pass an Islamic blasphemy law, another step on the road to replacement of our peoples in their only homelands.
Faced with this future, those of us who wish to stop, and reverse, the trends that are destroying our country, and Europe, need to reflect. In 1902, the evil genius of Bolshevism, Lenin, published his What Is To Be Done? At that point, the very idea of a successful Communist revolution seemed unbelievable. The great Empires of continental Europe – Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary – seemed set to continue. Lenin’s advice was, in essence, to build the revolutionary groups that would be essential when the weight of those empires would bring them down. They contained within them contradictions that could not be resolved. In the same way, the events of the last few days in Parliament show us, finally, that the system that is destroying our peoples and home is riven with contradictions that cannot be resolved by that system. Our job, then, is to build our patriotic groups. #GetActive.
0 Comments